Autofocus teleconverters

In the same way Can a Nikon use a teleconverter? Table of Contents. Tags: advices answers experts guides learn questions Technology updates tips.

Share Tweet Pin. Related Posts. Is a Nikon D a full frame camera? On the other hand, Nikon D has a What is the best app for stop motion?

Next Post. Discussion about this post. Does Sony a have timelapse? Which lens is best for Canon M50? When did the Sony A come out? A teleconverter or extender as Canon calls them is a gadget that fits between the lens and the camera body to magnify the image made by the lens.

A teleconverter sounds like the ideal solution for getting closer to a subject with your lens. And you need to choose wisely, as the best teleconverters will not work well with all lenses and cameras. At one time, they were sold as inexpensive gadgets that were widely compatible with different camera systems and lenses, but these days lens and camera designs are more complex, with sophisticated electronic data transfer and, sometimes with protruding rear lens elements. There are few 'generic' teleconverters still on the market and these have to be chosen with care to match your lenses.

But teleconverters have not disappeared. They have taken on a new role, mostly in long-range sports and wildlife photography.

So what do you need to know when choosing a teleconverter for your DSLR or mirrorless camera system? If I set the aperture of my lens to 2. Thanks for spotting the typo! Hi Dan…I enjoyed your article. I am an amateur photographer and frequently shoot my kids soccer games. I have a 5dii and use a 2. I generally get pretty good shots but would like a little more reach. Assuming a fairly sunny day around noon and using the 2x converter what shutter speed and iso would you recommend? I assume i would want the camera to maintain the lowest fstop 5.

I also shoot with shutter priority…. Thank you in advance for your help and all the best. For underwater photography, there can be good reasons for using a teleconverter with very wide angle lenses, even including a fisheye lens. For example one may want to narrow the field of coverage while keeping the better corner performance behind a dome. How would I calculate the change in diagonal field of view of the Nikon mm fisheye at 15mm on full format degrees at 15mm with a 1.

Will a TC even fit on that lens? On a recent trip to the Galapagos islands I rented a Canon and 1. I found the extender to result in too many missed shots for a few reasons you mentioned 1 slow autofocus, 2 light reduction, 3 camera shake in motorized raft. Upon reviewing my shots, I found that with the 50mp sensor sharp focus was very important to getting a quality image. My best shots were shot without the extender and [properly] using photoshop to enlarge the images after crop. With this camera, I found the light loss to be crippling with an extender.

I have a mm f2. How does the 2 times converter work on this? Is it a good travel combo — how would it compare to mk2 quality? It depends on which version of the Canon mm you have? Or perhaps something older? You mention both but you stop short. Also stability is hugely important, when you are shooting a scene at mm your subject will shake, I leverage VR and. Even with a 2X. Thanks for your post.

I have a mm Nikon lens and think I might need to upgrade my 1. Either by my own shake movement or not using the mirror up mode. No need to user mirror lock up mode. Many people shoot moving subjects with a tele lens and an TC. If you think something is really a long way off you could send the pair off to be calibrated by Nikon.

I would have thought that any prime mm from Nikon is capable though. Perhaps your expectations are too high? There will be some drop in sharpness. I have the latest mm Micro-Nikkor on a D If I have a ratio, that means that a rectangle of 36x24mm will fill the frame.

Now, if I add a 1. To my knowledge, the magnification ratio changes by the same amount as extender. So it would become These days I prefer using my full frame body for better IQ. In our situations, birds are sighted far away in most of the cases.

Bought the latter recently mainly to use with extenders. With a 2x on full frame and 1. Tried it with the 2x on crop body and the IQ took a hit though, captured all the shots I wanted whichever was within the range of my sight. When I imagine carrying a combo of a full frame body, a mm super telephoto lens and one 1.

Bottomline is; do whatever is convenient and suitable for you. Keep capturing the beauties of nature and present to common people in order to motivate them for saving it. Well said Sanjeed! There is no point having gear that inhibits your photography by making things too heavy or difficult to manage. It is for this very reason that I have owned a mm for so long, instead of a mm. It gives me framing versatility.

If I know what to expect and have a prime to cover it, I can get the best possible image quality. Even a good zoom like the Sony FE pairs well with a 1. So that lot offers a focal range of mm to mm and in a compact package.

With an A9 the low-light AF is surprisingly good even with the 2x TC but yes, you pay for it with losses in speed and subject isolation. What are your thoughts on this, is there a maximum f-stop for certain teleconverters, it is never given? You need to check which lenses work with TCs by looking at the manufacturer specification, or specifications provided by the maker of the TC if that is different.

But either way, I still think you are thinking about this in the wrong way. Additionally, a 2x teleconverter blocks three-quarters of the light from reaching your lens.

I only recommend using a 2x teleconverter with the following lenses:. Your cart is empty Return to Shop. Photography Buying Guide.